Healthcare or Hellcare?

It has become clear to most of America that socialized medicine is the worst option possible and the current system is much, much better than what the Dems have planned. Some Dems have sunken so low to call it a "moral obligation" to pass socialized medicine, this is not the case. In the moral grounds of health care, hospitals have to provide emergency care to any patient, regardless of whether or not they have insurance. So where does morality come in? Well in just the opposite way then what they claim. First, the immorality of the bill is that it will provide for coverage on abortions, simply because it does not address abortions means it does not outlaw them. So how does that moral standing feel now? Secondly, death panels are in existence and so a lovely set of people, who do not know your, your circumstances, religion, family, or anything about you other than your current medically assumed state will decide when you die, how comforting. So there are not "dignified" deaths, as they call them, because the death is predetermined and is made "easier" by doping up the patient. I guess doping now is dignified? Since when is this the case? This is simply a legalized Woodstock 60s death. How dignified and comforting, how wonderful.

In many cases you've heard, patients who even could have been saved and had a more prolonged life, socialized medicine, even in our own USA in Oregon, have been denied essential care for dope. The "big bad pharmaceutical company came to the rescue in one woman's case and gave her the medicine, socialized care wouldn't provide, for free. This is the absurdity of socialized care. So it looks like the "elected elite" also known as the aristocracy in the feudal system are trying to create just that, a feudal system of care and of government. Ask all the congressmen who are planning on voting for this bill whether or not they will take the care or will they purchase their own care, and 99% of them, if they're not lying, will buy their own. So the crowning elite will have their own bene's while you and I will be bought out by cheaper, less inclusive care that tells you when you get to die, not when you are going to die.

Lastly, people mention Japan as a "viable" option for care. There are many problems with this option but I will briefly describe a few of them. First, Japan is the exception not the rule for care and in the majority of cases it doesn't work. Secondly, inflation in cost of living in Japan is astronomical. Most of their living is done in small 500 sq ft. apartments, with barely enough room for a standing shower. Is this freedom? Is this liberty? Is this prosperity? Moreover, Japan has the highest corporate tax rates. Low production of new businesses in Japan, coupled with a very strict governmental law on jobs and type of jobs you can have does not = the freedom we so enjoy in America. Lastly, the public school teachers earn on average 1600 a month if it's their first year, whereas, in the US it varies but in this area of the world, teachers make closer to 2000 a month or more in this area.

P.S. I know this is a post on health care but I must say that the President addressing the kids and attaching lesson plans to "adore" the president the 1st day of school is ludicrous and for anyone who has actually been in the classroom before, the 1st day is not the day to be teaching a random socialist lesson, on a socialist speech given by the nations top sponsor of socialism.